Call it serendipity. It's curious and amazing how two random unconnected events can converge to provide a new way of thinking. I have been involved in a case where the parties signed a prenup roughly 35 years ago. The consequences of enforcement involve millions of dollars.
I too am a family law attorney, Steven, and I understand your concern. However, I cannot imagine a way to legislate a specific approach that allows for a relaxation of limitations over time. Also, if that were to occur, the comfort that the parties (or sometimes the wealthier party) can receive from the prenup would remain. Rather, the parties themselves can relax the restrictions in the terms of their agreement, if they wish, and they are in a far better position to try to foretell the future than would be a legislature. Indeed, I have seen prenups that "sunset," though that, too, has its own problems and issues.
I too am a family law attorney, Steven, and I understand your concern. However, I cannot imagine a way to legislate a specific approach that allows for a relaxation of limitations over time. Also, if that were to occur, the comfort that the parties (or sometimes the wealthier party) can receive from the prenup would remain. Rather, the parties themselves can relax the restrictions in the terms of their agreement, if they wish, and they are in a far better position to try to foretell the future than would be a legislature. Indeed, I have seen prenups that "sunset," though that, too, has its own problems and issues.
You:"Reach out to me"
I tried Jenna@peskindlaw.com and never heard back?